Jump to content

Talk:Brian Tierney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBrian Tierney has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Brian Tierney/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 18:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Web refs need access dates.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

The only issue I see with this article is that the references need access dates for the web links. Add these, and the article will be good to go for GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not sure that it is necessary for newspaper articles I have added access dates anyway. Thanks for the review. Medvedenko (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's mainly for the web links that the access dates are needed, not necessarily because of what you're referencing. Thanks for adding them. Everything looks good, so I am passing the article. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Brian Tierney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]