Talk:Brick Gothic
![]() | A fact from Brick Gothic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,036 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Backsteingotik from de.wikipedia. |
Picture St Mary Greifswald
[edit]is on the German [Brick gothik] page, since the Greifswald Commons is not working I could need some help to get it over here. More text to this article will be provided in the near future. Help on the article and more pictures, especially from historians in brick gothic cities, are welcome. --Kresspahl 16:13, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Development of the articles on de:WP and en:WP
[edit]The German article de:Backsteingotik (start:13.2.2004) was not a big one, when I started Brick Gothic here on 26.8.2005. What has happened since then? The German article split into the article and an additional list called de:Liste bedeutender Bauten der Backsteingotik (in English: List of important brick gothic buildings). I let things go, look what happened. The Germans didn't do anything on the en:WP article/list but worked hard on their "special" list of buildings. The en:WP article develloped as a list but not with the necessary content and explanation.--Kresspahl 21:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- What is your worry? Germans making the international community look bad? Editors who contribute to German (or any other) Wikipedia are not required to work in English Wikipedia, too. Besides, Germans are attacked on English Wikipedia, like people with insecurities like you, and there is no shortage on Wikipedia (84.181.112.22 is a German IP address), should lay off Wikipedia. -- Matthead discuß! O 07:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, this is not a good architecture article. I notice that the medieval churches of Groningen and Friesland are missing, but I would not know where to start editing this unwieldy article. Probably this article would benefit from a chronological or developmental organization, rather than a geographic one based on modern national borders. One could start with the examples of roman mixed brick/stone churches. /Pieter Kuiper 09:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- @Pieter Kuiper: At first, I did not find anything like [1] here. This could be an article to start with. Then you should name brick gothic buildings in the low countries and include them into the article, at least the most important ten or so. Its a wiki!--Kresspahl 07:23, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Mir Castle Complex.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Mir Castle Complex.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Problematic image has been replaced. athinaios (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
St. Anne's, Vilnius
[edit]How about adding something about St. Anne's Church, Vilnius in Lithuania — perhaps the most fanciful use of brick gothic ever? [2]
Sca (talk) 20:16, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
I think all mentions of 'ashley' on this page should be replaced by 'ashlar' (the former being a typo, I think).
Longman Modern English Dictionary has 'ashlar' or 'ashler'. 'ashley' I cannot find anywhere for this context.
Kwetal1 18:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwetal1 (talk • contribs)
Geographic scope of Brick Gothic
[edit]Should the article be re-engendered to focus on Brick Gothic architecture strictly around the Baltic Sea, or as the current editing trend has it include all gothic buildings made from brick regardless of location; including places like France, Italy, Netherlands and England (these can fall under regional categories such as Tudor or Perpendicular gothic)? That's why perhaps, the article should re-focus on a particular brand of Brick Gothic found around the Baltic Sea. --E-960 (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brick Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119031916/http://www.eurob.org:80/ to http://www.eurob.org
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115053836/http://www.wege-zur-backsteingotik.de:80/ to http://www.wege-zur-backsteingotik.de
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
The church has been inspired by English churches rather than by Brick Gothic [3].Xx236 (talk) 08:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- The page is exactly about Brick Gothic, not about any gothic revival.Xx236 (talk) 07:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)