Jump to content

Talk:Briones Reservoir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Wasn't sure if this gallery was suitable for this article. I can reduce the number of images, make them smaller, whatever. And if they seem out of place in the article I can remove them. Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice photos. My only objection would be that three of the five do not show the reservoir.--Fizbin (talk) 17:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These were all I had, which showed some of the 14 mi. walking trails mentioned in the article. Feel free to remove any that don't seem useful, however.Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Briones Park 38.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Briones Park 38.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Briones Park 38.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Briones Park.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Briones Park.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Briones Park.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Briones Reservoir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]