Talk:Bristol Channel pilot cutter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bristol Channel pilot cutter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many errors[edit]

This article is full of errors. For instance, a pilot cutter never went alongside a ship at sea. The pilot was transferred using the punt. (No, that is not the type of boat you find on the river at Cambridge.) Some decent references are needed, not stuff you can simply find on the internet. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 10:13, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some work done on the article. Need to discuss the masts. Also performance - note that slow to windward, but comfortable hove to. Description of the accommodation might be good. Need to correct the reason for the demise - mostly the removal of competition by the pilotage authority. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is alarming to see that some 75% or so of this article is written by a user who has been blocked for copyright violation (Trident13). ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]