Jump to content

Talk:British Columbia Southern Interior

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Census subdivisions vs polling subdivisions

[edit]

Vs. electoral areas, that is. While the census does use the provincially-derived regional district electoral areas as subdivisions, I'm not so sure this is the case with the polling subdivisions, which are federally-defined, though using electoral area boundaries in spots I'd imagine, simply because the census does. However, I think you'll find that some RD electoral areas are in more than one riding; ridings do not coincide with electoral districts, I don't see why polling boundaries would be. Also federal and provincial polling subdivisions are different; and not even provincial polling districts have much to do with electoral areas (more to do with postal codes, I think....). What I'm getting at is I don't see the relevance of electoral/census subdivisions when there exist more relevant polling divisions; I'm not familiar enough with the latest round of redistribution to offer comparative examples; maybe I'm wrong and the electoral areas and polling subdivisions are identical - polling divisions are lot smaller than EAs though so probably several within each one, huh? Historically, though, provincial and federal administrative boundaries of all types in British Columbia have rarely coincided historically unless mandated by the landscape; maybe with polling there's a direct link to the census subdivisions; but the "background" riding boundaries were evolved long before RDs came into existence, likewise the polling divisions. Can someone prove for me that the EAs are how Elections Canada breaks down the electoral district? If not, then the list of EAs should be removed and replaced with a list of communities/places.Skookum1 (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Columbia Southern Interior. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]