Talk:Brookvale Oval

Australia: Sydney / Rugby league Low‑importance

	Australia portal Brookvale Oval is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rugby league (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Rugby league Low‑importance

	Brookvale Oval is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two gallery pictures seem to have wrong titles[edit]

I think that the images for the "Ken Arthurson Stand" and "Jane Try Stand" need to have their titles swapped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.7.166.180 (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Brookvale Oval/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article must have been written by the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles or a close associate. It is a very subjective, one-sided perspective and does not take into account any of the other stakeholder's viewpoints. Major historical facts are omitted, important social and political aspects - especially surrounding the upgrade - are neglected. There are no proper references and it is a clearly biased article which seems to mainly aim to garner support for the current lobby campaign to extract taxpayer funds to finance the privately owned enterprise. Needs to be reviewed and include more viewpoints and appropriate coverage of controversial points. Do you have peacocks for PR campaigns and lobby groups?

Last edited at 12:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 10:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brookvale Oval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]