Talk:Brotherton Library
 | A fact from Brotherton Library appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 August 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Brotherton Library be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Yorkshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Category
[edit]The category Category:Libraries in Warwickshire appears on the article but I can find no mention of Warwickshire in the article. Is this incorrect or is there some information missing from article? Keith D (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- It was certainly in WYorks when I worked there ... I think the amazing DGG may have nodded for once, so have corrected the cat but dropped a note on his talk page too. PamD 23:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I thought there may be something I was missing. Keith D (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Photographs needed
[edit]Owing to the fact this building is surrounded by others it would be difficult to photograph,. Might need to be internal. Mtaylor848 (talk) 11:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The University of Leeds recently posted some photos publicly on Twitter, including images of the Brotherton Library before the Parkinson building was completed (so it's an excellent picture of the outside of the building). However, I am unfamiliar with Twitter copyright rules. Would it be okay to take the image from there? JacobAronson 17:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brotherton Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720235322/http://library.leeds.ac.uk:80/info/200189/library_sites/374/university_gallery to http://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/200189/library_sites/374/university_gallery
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721125240/http://library.leeds.ac.uk:80/info/200189/library_sites/373/university_archive to http://library.leeds.ac.uk/info/200189/library_sites/373/university_archive
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)