Talk:Broughton-in-Furness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

links to personal home pages such as GeoCities are not allowed please read the wiki rules about external links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_links

CCHT external link[edit]

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 10:06, 06 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Broughton-in-FurnessBroughton in Furness – Per the Ordnance Survey and road signs. The non-hyphonated version is also currently used in this article's text. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak oppose — weak because some sources do indeed use the non-hyphenated form, but oppose because various others[1][2][3][4] retain the hyphens. While usage remains split, best not to re-title. ╠╣uw [talk] 10:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting that the 3rd source does use no hyphens in text ("Broughton in Furness CE Primary School") even though it uses them in the title. Vision of Britain uses no hyphens in the name of the title put the quote does use hyphens, maybe hyphens were more common in the past but old maps also don't show hyphens. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose: Where there's evidence for both hyphenated and non-hyphenated forms, my preference is to hyphenate to reduce ambiguity. In text, does "Broughton in Furness" mean a place called "Broughton" that is in Furness, or a place called "Broughton in Furness"? Hyphens remove that ambiguity. -- Dr Greg  talk  12:39, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.