Talk:Brush arbour revival
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brush arbour revival article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Information lacking
[edit]What country? Sounds American, but arbour is not an American spelling. Koro Neil (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- I see some busy person has decided that there is a thing called International English, which is apparently identical to British/Commonwealth English, and has accordingly "corrected" the spelling of arbor to arbour. Unfortunately, I don't know how to search for the Wikipedia guidelines on spelling that explains the whole US vs other spelling thing, or I would go through, revert the spellings and refer the busy person to said guidelines. (I'm a New Zealander, and my own spelling happens to be arbour.)
- More broadly, why isn't there anything in the side columns to help us find these guidelines easily? Koro Neil (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- Start-Class Methodism work group articles
- High-importance Methodism work group articles
- Methodism work group articles
- Start-Class Holiness Movement articles
- High-importance Holiness Movement articles
- WikiProject Holiness Movement articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles