Jump to content

Talk:Buangkok MRT station/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123 Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Arconning: Responded.--ZKang123 (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and MoS[edit]

Lead and infobox[edit]

  • The station will also serve an upcoming integrated development Sengkang Grand Residencies and a future bus interchange., add commas after development and Residencies.
  • Civil Defence shelter, add comma at the end.
  • An Art-in-Transit artwork Water, Nature and the Contemporary by Vincent Leow is displayed at this station., An Art-in-Transit artwork by Vincent Leow, Water, Nature & Contemporary, is displayed at this station.

Constructions[edit]

  • re-developed, remove hyphen.

Delay in opening[edit]

White elephant incidents and station opening[edit]

Details[edit]

Artwork[edit]

Images[edit]

  • Images have proper licenses and are relevant to the article.

Refs[edit]

  • I would suggest linking the references without links, though a source is a source. Pass.
  • Random source check: References 2, 15, and 30, are okay.
  • Reference 44 has moved to a new location. Information is not on the current website provided.
  • Earwig's fine, manual check same. Pass.

Misc[edit]

  • No ongoing edit war, focused and broad information about the topic, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed