Jump to content

Talk:Bucerius Law School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How do I grab the GDFL from the German article?

[edit]

I saw this free image on the German article and I'd like to use it --is there an easy way to transfer it to the English wikipedia? --Bobak 00:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Download and reupload to commons. I have done that. Kusma (討論) 00:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

[edit]

I attend this school. You call the article a stub - I think it's quite long for a really tiny university like Bucerius. What else would you want to know? --85.176.0.164 22:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's not true. It is yet the finest school for law in Germany... so I think it deserves some damn good treatment.

Comment: So, why is this called a stub? See:

The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element; it has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
- A particularly useful picture or graphic
- Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
- A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
- Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article

— WP:GER/A
This article don't have sections or subheadings. And a major problem there are no reliable, independent sources. Add them and this article will be start class or better. The image and the logo is not a "serious element of gathered material" IMHO. Greetings. Sebastian scha. (talk) 21:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Partner schools

[edit]

Is it really necessary having this bandwagon list of universities in the article? It's both unaesthetic and against WP:NPOV since only the most notable schools are listed. Out of 87, there's also a lot of no-names. 188.99.186.112 (talk) 16:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can go ahead and delete it. --Gnom (talk) 23:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done 188.99.178.246 (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I took out the London School of Economics as a partner university as this is wrong (source: http://www.law-school.de/partneruniversitaeten.html). I think the representative number of partner universities listed in the article is fine, especially as this is also common in other wiki-texts on universities and provides valuable information for people interested in the university. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.14.22.175 (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bucerius Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bucerius Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

This article should be written in a more neutral way. --Delfield (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

The tone of this article does not appear to be neutral and partially reads like an ad/lacks NPOV. I consider a rework to be appropriate, does anybody disagree? FortunateSons (talk) 22:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted two edits for lacking citations, please add those before adding the content FortunateSons (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Technical) COI disclosure

[edit]

I have what a strict reading could plausibly describe as a non-financial conflict of interest in regards to this article. While I believe that my editing (both talk page and article) is not affected by it, I have voluntarily chosen to provide this disclaimer in addition to the one on my user page. FortunateSons (talk) 08:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CN tags

[edit]

Hello @Gnom, thank you for your interest in this article. Unfortunately, your edit summary does not match the content of your edit: multiple tags were removed without replacement. Could you please either restore the tag or find a source? FortunateSons (talk) 21:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I am happy to put an individual link to the respective sub-page of the BLS website for each and every sentence in the article, but can we maybe limit that to the key statements in the article? Gnom (talk) 22:44, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We should check is some of those are due at all, but yes, we shouldn’t have entirely unsourced paragraphs or subheadings. Not every sentence of course, but we also shouldn’t have unverified content in the article, particularly considering that (based on their name) at least one of the contributors is likely to have a strong connection to the school. link FortunateSons (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I just added three more references to the website. For transparency: I am also an alumn of this institution. Gnom (talk) 12:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I appreciate the transparency. I don’t consider being an alumni to be a COI per se, and I’m confident an experienced editor such as yourself can avoid the common pitfalls of COI editing. :) FortunateSons (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bucerius_Law_School&oldid=1240795945"