Talk:Bukit Timah railway station

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Untitled[edit]

Wonderful. A minor, long-defunct station in Singapore gets several sections worth of relevant information, as are the other two Singapore stations. We Malaysians on the other hand have an excessive of over A HUNDRED stations, and only around half of them have pages, with most of these pages barely breaking past two or three sections if they even consist of more than just a single infobox and ONE line. What are the Malaysian editors doing? - 60.49.105.187 (talk) 10:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not because of what the Malaysian editors are doing, that's because unlike Singapore, most railway stations in Malaysia are gone through demolitions or being preserved for other uses like for example: restaurant for the old Tanjung Malim railway station, clinic for the old Kampar station and the Ulu Yam station being abandoned and sealed off by KTMB.

While on the other hand KTMB only had two railway stations at Tanjong Pagar and Bukit Timah and an abandoned halt at Tanglin in Singapore, so except for Tanglin railway halt, the two buildings are the only stations left to show Malaysia's past iron fist rule over the two stations and their historic heritage in Singapore. Kyrios320 (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bukit Timah railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160417225759/http://www.nhb.gov.sg/places/trails/bukit-timah/trail-sites/places-of-interest/bukit-timah-railway-station to http://www.nhb.gov.sg/places/trails/bukit-timah/trail-sites/places-of-interest/bukit-timah-railway-station

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]