Talk:Burke & Hare (2010 film)

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Incorrect synopsis

I've just watched the movie and I've noticed the synopsis is incorrect and I think it should be revised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.6.193.100 (talk) 22:47, 2011 July 22 (UTC)

Japan and America claims

I've just removed text from this article where it said that it was a "British-Japanese-American" film. The claims were added in these edits by a now-blocked user. As far as I can find this film is all British; the studio is based in London, for example. But if anyone has further information on this, please bring it up and we can discuss. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 21:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An anon IP editor added in text about HiT Entertainment being behind the movie as well, but I can't find any sources to corroborate that. Once we find a reliable source that says that they're involved, then we can add the text. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies section

I've removed the Inaccuracies section added by 217.41.240.15 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) because it's entirely original research. How factually true it may be is irrelevant; either way, it's unsourced and can't be added. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need to know the companies that supplied the dogs in the film? Isn't that just a blatant addition on the company's part? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.145.62 (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burke & Hare (2010 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110102061925/http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/burke-hare-trailer.php to http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/burke-hare-trailer.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]