Jump to content

Talk:Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Discussion moved from VfD:

  • Book review, not encyclopedic -- JeLuF 07:44, Mar 13, 2004 (UTC)
    • I'm sorry. I'll try to fix it. I'll try to make more of a description rather than a review.
  • Keep for now, post on cleanup. Give brand new articles time to cook. Davodd 08:57, Mar 13, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Enormously significant book. Agree the article needs work. Andrewa 09:59, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. - Concur with Andrewa PilotPrecise 10:06, 13 March 2004 (UTC)
  • Important book, but this article does it no justice. heidimo 15:45, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

It seems we have consensus to keep and improve, and a lot of interest.

My copy is in storage, so for the moment all I will do is encourage others, especially the original creator who IMO has made a very good start. I also recommend Black Elk Speaks if you can find it. Andrewa 19:07, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

This is a great and important book, and we really need an article about it, but this is just garbage. I hope it improves. RickK | Talk 21:46, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Impact of the Book: Help Needed!

The impact of this book is what makes it notable; it literally changed the way non-Indian Americans think about Indians. I put in a short section on this topic, which needs sources! For example, what were the contemporary book reviews say about it? What did its critics say? What proof do we have that it had an impact. It's a great book both for its content and for what it did, which I remember (but for which I have few references.) rewinn 03:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Strength of the book

I understand an editor removed (and another promptly restored) a comment about the strength of this book, commenting "not a book review". However, this is an article about the book, which necessarily shares elements with book reviews. It would be desirable to quote authorities on the book as to why this book had so strong an impact on the United States and our perception of our first peoples; it seems clear that it is in part because of its (for its time) fresh look at history but also because of its strong documentation. I have had little luck finding links, and I urge contributors to add what they can. rewinn 04:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Genocide vs. slaughter

I reverted an edit that had replaced "displacement and slaughter" with "genocide". I don't think "slaughter" is a gentle term; I think it is more accurate than "genocide" with respect to what the book talks about. And it is less likely to mix the article up with technical and political questions of just what constitutes genocide. rewinn 04:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality

I'm not sure if the use of "slaughter" and "over estimate the impact" can be considered to be neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srajan01 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bury my.JPG

Image:Bury my.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Criticism Expansion

This section should be expanded in my opinion. Dee Brown (while a fun read for the average person) is an absolute joke to 90% of history scholars. This book is equally as important for it's derision as it is for bring the plight of the Native Americans to the national forefront again. Huntmog (talk) 17:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bury_My_Heart_at_Wounded_Knee/Archive_1&oldid=1169746134"