Jump to content

Talk:Business reference model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference Model Example..!?

[edit]

I removed the following link

This seems like a serious and interesting link, but I am not sure this work classifies as a Business reference model.

-- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double entry:

[edit]

The sentence "While many models exist for describing organizations - org charts, location maps, etc. - this model presents the business using a functionally driven approach." is already said in the section before, word by word. > gertraud — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.26.160.181 (talk) 14:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Business reference model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]