Jump to content

Talk:Butterfield Elementary School (Lake Elsinore, California)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Permission

[edit]

I, David Pickett, am author of the web site found at

http://leusd.info/bes/ also found at

http://butterfieldelementary.org and at http://leusd.bes.schoolfusion.us/modules/cms/pages.phtml?pageid=76945&sessionid=1420b8fb715e6e7693d98c9a838ee939


http://leusd.info/bes/BESHistory/History.htm They are fully of my authorship.

permission is granted for its inclusion here. DavidPickett 15:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)David Pickett[reply]

Could you please email this information to the office so that we can confirm it? Or you can place the text on the website. Please see template:sd-copyvio for explanations. The Evil Spartan 02:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I blanked the page per the required process at WP:CP pending confirmation of the author's ownership of the text on the other website. Please see WP:DCP for more details. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks  01:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What else do you need?

[edit]

I have emailed the following copyright release info to the given address.What else do you want?

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ http://www.leusd.k12.ca.us/bes/history/history.htm] also found at [ http://leusd.info/bes/history/history.htm] and also at [ http://www.butterfieldelementary.org/bes/history/history.htm]

I agree to publish that work under the free license LICENSE {{PD-self}}.

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

DATE, NAME OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER 8/29/07, David Pickett

This was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org on Sent: Wed 8/29/2007 8:46 AM

  • We want you to settle down and wait for your email to be processed. This is a volunteer-run organization and things take time; I've emailed permissions in from various folks and waited as long as a month before my email was read. You'll get a reply with a ticket number and some more instructions. Be patient. Thanks. - KrakatoaKatie 03:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for response

[edit]

Everything has happened so fast up till now, I expected the copyright thing to be cleared up in a hurry. I've even sent a notice to staff on our school email, since it seemed to be going so well. I thought the copyright thing was handled yesterday, when the first notice was up.DavidPickett


Release has been added to: to http://leusd.info/bes/BESHistory/History.htm and connecting page: to http://leusd.info/bes/Copyright/GNUFreeDocumentationLicense.htm

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidPickett (talkcontribs) 04:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that satisfies all requirements. I'll clean things up. Thanks for your contribution! -- But|seriously|folks  21:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox placement

[edit]

Almost every article on wikipedia that has an infox has it as the first item on the page. Consistency is one of the key benefits of the infobox. Is there a specific reason that this page should be different? Arthurrh (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

[edit]

I am assessing this article as B / Mid. Most elementary schools are not notable but this article shows quite an exception to this. This is quite a good article and could even meet the Good article criteria with work. My first thoughts when seeing the article were - external links, there are a lot of them, too many. The article should contain a few external links in the external links section, usually the official site and a few other important relevant ones. All other links should be part of in-line citations using <ref></ref> tags, external links within the text should be kept to a minimum, and individual news articles should really only be in in-line citations unless they have particular importance to the article. See Wikipedia:External links for further guidance. The section set-up can also be improved, try and not repeat the article title in section tiles, and if possible create sub-sections to seperate large amounts of text. The introduction is rather short for an article this size, consider expanding it, use Wikipedia:Lead section for guidance. Finally, try and consider moving the logo into the info-box, where it generally should be for school articles. I am giving this article mid importance for the schools quite notable visual and performing arts program, history, and awards. Camaron | Chris (talk) 20:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a user who set this back to -start class, who also did not read all notes, as I am author of both this page and the one found at http://leusd.info/bes/BESHistory/History.htm which is noted above with a release and in the reference section.DavidPickett (talk) 19:23, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Butterfield Elementary School (Lake Elsinore, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]