Jump to content

Talk:Byzantinism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Byzantine Empire

[edit]

Ghirlandajo: I still don't understand why you insist on removing the Byzantine Empire link, directly related to the name of the article. Care to explain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trapolator (talkcontribs) 01:01, November 8, 2005

Derogatory use of "Byzantine"

[edit]

Some salvagable content of Derogatory use of "Byzantine" has been merged here; there have been no objections on talk of that article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 13:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Third Rome: A book

[edit]

There's a book titled The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism and Orthodoxy. Available from Amazon.

It is not just medieval, either. Check out Evgeny Pavlov's writing titled The new Third Rome? Moscow in the Russian culture of the 1990s. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 18:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quote:

ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 18:30, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I do wonder how relevant is this to Byzantinism, though? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 13:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Separation of criticism of the term from criticism of the concept

[edit]

I think that criticism of Byzantine politics and criticism of the concept of Byzantinism as a poor generalisation of Byzantine Empire should be discussed separately. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 19:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 13:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Byzantinism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Separating the term Byzantine from the concept Byzantinism

[edit]

Byzantinism and the term Byzantine really aren't related intellectually. For example I came across the page from a Eurasian page and was confused as to why the majority of the page dealt not in political philosophy but a discussion of a dictionary definition of a word.

I think the pages should be split since they seem entirely unrelated. If there is a relation in the concepts, it should be made more explicit. TheDangerRanger (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]