Talk:CBU-107 Passive Attack Weapon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CBU-107 Passive Attack Weapon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Is this a cluster bomb?[edit]

The name CBU-107 suggests that it's a cluster bomb but I can't tell from the description whether it meets the definition so I'm not sure whether to add it to Category:Cluster bombs. Polemarchus (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that it contains 3750 separate tungsten rods suggests that it is, in fact, a cluster munition. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]