Jump to content

Talk:CIM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Is "come in mouth" really necessary? I mean, I know "Wikipedia isn't censored", but....

If no one objects in a day or two, I'm going to remove the "come in mouth" entry. It seems too trivial to be useful. The Letter J 16:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If people were wondering what it meant...

I mean, I don't think Wikipedia should really censor itself like this to people who are looking for factual verifiable information.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-added the "cum in mouth" entry, as although I don't disagree with the editor who removed it, and their reasons, I believe it is more in accordance with wikipedia policy for it to stay. I am certainly not aware of any policy demanding its removal. If we remove this, then we should also remove the "oral sex" article, and I don't believe that would be an encyclopedic thing to do either. --Rebroad (talk) 10:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact of the matter is that with any TLA (three letter acronym) article, you are going to find a very wide variety of definitions, some of which may cause offense to some people. I guess it will never be possible to please everyone all of the time in such scenarios. --Rebroad (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]