Talk:CIM

Is "come in mouth" really necessary? I mean, I know "Wikipedia isn't censored", but....

If no one objects in a day or two, I'm going to remove the "come in mouth" entry. It seems too trivial to be useful. The Letter J 16:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If people were wondering what it meant...

I mean, I don't think Wikipedia should really censor itself like this to people who are looking for factual verifiable information.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-added the "cum in mouth" entry, as although I don't disagree with the editor who removed it, and their reasons, I believe it is more in accordance with wikipedia policy for it to stay. I am certainly not aware of any policy demanding its removal. If we remove this, then we should also remove the "oral sex" article, and I don't believe that would be an encyclopedic thing to do either. --Rebroad (talk) 10:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact of the matter is that with any TLA (three letter acronym) article, you are going to find a very wide variety of definitions, some of which may cause offense to some people. I guess it will never be possible to please everyone all of the time in such scenarios. --Rebroad (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]