Talk:Cadet Field House

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cadet Field House article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States Stub‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge the two arena pages into Cadet Field House on the grounds that the 2 stubs are best discussed with the context of the complex. Klbrain (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need 3 articles for the same sport complex? I propose to merge Cadet Ice Arena, Clune Arena and Air Force Academy Cadet Fieldhouse Legend-dary (talk) 02:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is fairly standard to split out the major components of a sports complex. It is unfortunate that all the current articles are stubs so it would also not hurt to much to have them merged. But if all of them were fleshed out to "perfect" articles then separate would be the preferable state. -DJSasso (talk) 11:45, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is an small complex both Arenas don't really need their own article. Seems unnecessary to me. Legend-dary (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They are not the same venue, they are the same complex. See also Tate Rink and Christl Arena for a comparable example where we have separate articles, reflecting standard practice even for small venues (and there are numerous examples for larger ones.) Smartyllama (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I support the merge as the Cadet Ice Arena and Clune Arena are very small articles and would fit very comfortably in the Facilities section of Cadet Field House.– BrandonXLF (talk) 03:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.