Talk:Cairn o' Mount

Scotland: Transport in Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Should this be renamed Cairn o' Mount? The old form Mounth may account for lack of links Finavon 19:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cairn O' Mount redirects here. While I'm here, this is shockingly lacking in sources - there isn't even as much as an external link at the bottom, never mind citations.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 03:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

I've proposed merging this with Cairnamounth, as they refer (I believe) to the same route. Combining the two pages would result in a stronger article. DWeir (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge, since these are two different things, each deserving of its own page. 76.191.143.183 (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you any evidence to support this, as the sites I've visited [1][2][3] suggest otherwise. Perhaps someone with a copy of Haldane's book could weigh in? DWeir (talk) 23:57, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oppose merge, it seems the sources you provide re-inforce my point that there is a modern road, ancient trackway and archaeological site of essentially the same name, but they are indeed separate objects. No support for the merge in two years. Suggest respectfully we abandon the banner. cheers 76.191.143.183 (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 January 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 04:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cairn O' Mounth → Cairn o' Mount – This is the spelling used by the Ordnance Survey, the Gazetteer for Scotland, and Aberdeenshire Council. It returns 34,100 results on Google, compared to 1,140 for "Cairn o' Mounth". Note also that the "o" is a preposition and should not be capitalized. Zacwill (talk) 17:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Ngrams does back up "Mount", if I've done it correctly. Dank Jae 13:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.