Talk:Caleana
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Caleana appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page move
[edit]There were two articles on the same subject, one at Caleana, and one at Caleana major. I added everything in "Caleana" that was not already covered at "Caleana major" to "Caleana major", and then moved that article to this title. The article previously at "Caleana" is preserved at Talk:Caleana/Old. --Stemonitis (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
No longer monotypic
[edit]Caleana is no longer a monotypic (Caleana major) genus. I propose to copy the content of Caleana to here and write an article on the genus at the present page titled Caleana.Gderrin (talk) 07:45, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles