Talk:California State Route 103/Archive 1

Archive 1

Debate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 09:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

The article covers all of the freeway, not just the SR 103 part. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 21:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Oppose move. This article is for 103 only. The rest of the information on the Terminal Is. Fwy should be covered elsewhere.JohnnyBGood 00:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Oppose Seconded. Also why didn;t you do this for the CA hwy articles? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Why shouldn't we cover the whole thing in one article? It is a standard example of two similar topics that should be merged. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 04:09, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Interstate 405 (California) versus the San Diego Freeway? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The San Diego Freeway is a good deal longer than I-405. Here, the majority of the Terminal Island Freeway is or was SR 103. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 04:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Support move to Terminal Island Freeway. ^BlankVerse 13:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Oppose As said above, this article is just for CA/SR103; the entire freeway is more than just 103. atanamir 19:52, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually I've merged Terminal Island Freeway into this; I just did the merge in the wrong direction. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 20:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.