Talk:California State Route 115
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 115 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
California State Route 115 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 6, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 115/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Biblioworm (talk · contribs) 05:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Review In progress. --Biblioworm 05:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
@Rschen7754: Here's my review:
- Is the article well-written? - Yes. I found one word tweak you could make, but otherwise, there's really nothing else.
- The segment south of SR 78 was altered in 1972; the portion between I-8 south to SR 98 near Bonds Corner was deleted, and the definition was clarified from "Route 8 near Holtville" to "Route 8 southeasterly of Holtville".
- I think "deleted" could be changed to "removed". (It sounds a bit more professional, in my opinion).
- The segment south of SR 78 was altered in 1972; the portion between I-8 south to SR 98 near Bonds Corner was deleted, and the definition was clarified from "Route 8 near Holtville" to "Route 8 southeasterly of Holtville".
- Is the article verifiable with no original research? - Yes.
- Is the article broad in its coverage? - Yes.
- Is the article neutral? - Yes.
- Is the article stable? - Yes.
- Is the article illustrated? - There's really only one illustration (the map in the infobox), but illustrations are not a necessity.
- Result: Pass. Congratulations! --Biblioworm 16:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! --Rschen7754 17:13, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
No relation to Route 15 or Interstate 15
[edit]Worth noting that the road has no apparent relation to Route 15 or Interstate 15 (despite 115 being an appropriate number for a branch Interstate), which are in another part of San Diego County. ~ knoodelhed (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
- Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class Road transport articles
- Mid-importance Road transport articles
- U.S. state highway articles
- GA-Class California road transport articles
- Mid-importance California road transport articles
- California road transport articles
- GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles