Talk:California State Route 149/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- In the History, it describes a past construction project in future tense.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- In the route description, is it possible to mention how many lanes SR 149 is and whether or not it is a divided highway?
- It apparently is a divided highway; can't say much more than that. --Rschen7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Source found for lanes. --Rschen7754 08:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- What kind of rural features does it pass? Farms? Woods?
- Not done; I think the article's specific enough. --Rschen7754 09:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- In the route description, indicate the termini are interchanges.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I will place the article on hold for some minor fixes. Dough4872 02:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to need at least a few days. I just noticed that there are some dead links that need to be dealt with. --Rschen7754 22:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I tried to get the dead links resolved; one remains. Got everything else except for one that I disagree with. --Rschen7754 08:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Once the remaining dead links are taken care of I will pass the article. Dough4872 19:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, according to the external links too these links are dead but they came up for me. Therefore, I will pass the article. Dough4872 20:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Once the remaining dead links are taken care of I will pass the article. Dough4872 19:59, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, I tried to get the dead links resolved; one remains. Got everything else except for one that I disagree with. --Rschen7754 08:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)