Talk:Cambamba
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Sources[edit]
@Gary Dee: you asked for sources. Is this one? G S Palmer (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- This and this and this. G S Palmer (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- No. These are ! https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cambamba&diff=611576277&oldid=611576098 --Gary Dee 22:35, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. Then here (@19:58) you ask (say) quote (reply): Not sure exactly what you're talking about...LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL (ROFLoor)...And at 20:02, you open a conversation at the talk page (although you did not UNDERSTAND before, as it clears yor NOT SURE...BLABLABLA). And then you come up With my tiny, tiny REFS. Do not forget, wherever you come from and me to can log activities...In God we Bleess & Bless ! Remember for Future: Take your Time in searching Sources instead of trying to provoke Edit-Wars, inside the Project, otherwise you will never become a member of it. Members help, it (the Project), NEVER Provoke. You have a hard lesson before of Your Mission. ADELE --Gary Dee 22:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I've been sitting here trying to make sense of your comment, and have some to the inescapable conclusion that you are utterly incoherent. If you wish to impart information to me, you're going to have to try a bit harder. G S Palmer (talk) 23:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Anyway, what I was unclear about was what you meant by
provoking under the freedom of speech and trolling templates all the time
. G S Palmer (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)- But no matter what you meant, I congratulate you on finding better sources for the article. G S Palmer (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand. I am here since...Nomatter.
- Point 1. I know your questioning of sense (especially in the WP Matter). But if it would not be so, sitting & questioning, life would be nothing (without it). Life is a just simplefying (Quest(tion)). Otherwise we would not be living. Dont tell me. Point 2. Same as Point 1 (One). Point 3. Same as Number 1 and 2. With a slight difference: Thank You ! ;) --Gary Dee 23:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I understand. I am here since...Nomatter.
- But no matter what you meant, I congratulate you on finding better sources for the article. G S Palmer (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Anyway, what I was unclear about was what you meant by
- I've been sitting here trying to make sense of your comment, and have some to the inescapable conclusion that you are utterly incoherent. If you wish to impart information to me, you're going to have to try a bit harder. G S Palmer (talk) 23:13, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. Then here (@19:58) you ask (say) quote (reply): Not sure exactly what you're talking about...LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL (ROFLoor)...And at 20:02, you open a conversation at the talk page (although you did not UNDERSTAND before, as it clears yor NOT SURE...BLABLABLA). And then you come up With my tiny, tiny REFS. Do not forget, wherever you come from and me to can log activities...In God we Bleess & Bless ! Remember for Future: Take your Time in searching Sources instead of trying to provoke Edit-Wars, inside the Project, otherwise you will never become a member of it. Members help, it (the Project), NEVER Provoke. You have a hard lesson before of Your Mission. ADELE --Gary Dee 22:56, 4 June 2014 (UTC)