Talk:Camellia reticulata
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cwalbri.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Camellia reticulata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821182008/http://www.uniklinik-saarland.de/med_fak/physiol2/camellia/register/species/spec_rs.htm to http://www.uniklinik-saarland.de/med_fak/physiol2/camellia/register/species/spec_rs.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, that drawing, far too many petals for the wild species, should be 5 tot 7. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.249.64.7 (talk) 09:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect fact[edit]
The claim "It remained the only known reticulata cultivated in Europe for over a century" is incorrect. According to the site A Fresh Look at Camellia reticulata of the Pacific Horticulture Society there was at least another cultivar called ‘Robert Fortune’ that was introduced to Europe in the 19th century. אביהו (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)