Talk:Can't Get You Out of My Head/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 01:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC) I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Composition", "Music video", "Formats and track listings", "Charts", "Certifications", "Further reading".

Background and recording

While it's natural to have the pull quote at the top of a section, the content of the quote is referenced in the second paragraph. I'd suggest moving the quote box down there, or perhaps even making it an indented quote in the actual text.

Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Shouldn't it be square brackets for the inserted words in quotes, as opposed to parenthesis?

Oh yes, I've changed them now.

Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If a quote uses quotation marks, those quotation marks are 'downgraded to these ones'.

Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The italic word "Sessions" leans too far into "version", when there's just a hyphen. En-dash?

Done --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Slant Magazine not italicized?

The Wikipedia page for Slant Magazine does not italicise it, and I think it is because it's an online publication and not print media. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Live performances

Is setlist really one word?

The WP page on "setlist" says it is referred to in single word form too. If you want I can change it to "set list" too.

External links

So Kylie doesn't have a page devoted to the song/single?

Added that. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's a start, a few more sections yet to be read/reviewed, and then of course a reference check. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly an "all clear" from Checklinks. They only find six "Uncategorized redirects", all the of the rest of the sites are still alive and ticking. Basically, just follow the links on this results page, and use those URLs as the replacement. The new URL is usually just a few character different. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done all. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Background and recording", "Critical reception" (interesting re: Slant), "Live performances" (no no, if the WP page says setlist is valid, I have no reason to contest), "External links".

Thanks! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

Any chance you can find any stats for Canada, for this section or "Charts"?

Nope, I tried a lot of sources and I couldn't find anything. Maybe it didn't chart in the country. I even checked the Canadian certifications database, and the song doesn't seem to have any certification, pretty unlikely for a song like this, so maybe it didn't chart after all. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy

I'm wondering if "Noughties" should be wikilinked? Even though I recognized it, I'm not sure how universal this term is.

Okay I wikilinked it. I don't think I can change the word as it is the name of the list. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 14:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images, sound licensing Passing.

References Seem to all be in order. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Curious that it's not in the Canadian certifications database. I'm certain that it was featured in CHUM FM television ads for a while. Anyway, I can't say you didn't try to look.

Everything seems to be in order, otherwise, so passing! -- Zanimum (talk) 21:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so so much for conducting such a clean and useful review! The nomination had been lying around for so long I thought it might end up in the backlog! Thanks for taking up the review again! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.