Talk:Canada men's national basketball team

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles

Canada: Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Uniform

I am watching USA beat Canada in the FIBA Americas tournament right now and strangly Canada is wearing blue. The uniforms listed in this article are white and red. The uniform data in the article needs to be changed. --Jon in California 25 August 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.73.82 (talk) 19:37, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

I think it's black? I'll edit it anyway... --Howard the Duck 05:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have assessed this as a Start, as it contains enough organization to be above a Stub, although it requires far more detail. It has assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 21:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to make moves as requested Mike Cline (talk) 14:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Preferred format used by Wiki sports (national sports teams) articles (See: List of men's national basketball teams)relisted--Mike Cline (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC) relisted--Mike Cline (talk) 01:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Hadi Payami (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Seems a bit sexist to assume the men's team is the only national team. 76.65.128.132 (talk) 12:45, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, these are not uncontroversial moves, as both the men's and women's teams in these countries are significant - see also e.g. United States men's national soccer team and United States women's national soccer team. 109.154.92.206 (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT There's nothing sexist, it's just an adapted format used by basketball writers to make the titles simpler.

- P.S. Women's basketball teams in other countries other than those 4 are also significant. See Australia national basketball team and their more fancied compatriots, Australia women's national basketball team as an example. 2sc945 (talk) 13:06, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strongest possible oppose. Assuming that a reader is looking for the men's team is the height of sexism, and it drives potential female editors off. Powers ^T 01:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Powers. Instead the words in the article titles should be "reshuffled" to conform to other team sports' naming standard, i.e. "Canada national men's basketball team" should be moved to "Canada men's national basketball team" ("national" after "men's", not before, if you don't see the difference). Cf. Canada men's national ice hockey team. The proposed title would have to be disambiguated. HandsomeFella (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Modification: I'm not sure that this is a sexist thing, but in the name of consistency (not to mention logic), I still oppose the proposed move. Being precise is better than being simple. And what if a sport prodominantly played by women would enjoy increased popularity with men's teams? Would we then have "Canada national xxxxxx team" for the women, and "Canada men's national xxxxxx team" for the men? Maybe it's a little sexist after all... HandsomeFella (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support We are discussing the naming of articles concerning national basketball teams, not soccer teams, they belong to another community. There is a consensus within the wiki basketball community that we should keep basketball-related titles as simple as possible. The word "women's" were added to female national teams only as a distinction from their male counterparts, any attempt to link them to sexist is an overreaction. I think the List of men's national basketball teams referred by Hadi Payami have cleary shown the type of naming format used by most national basketball teams. In fact, all wiki articles concerning basketball tournaments use the same sort of format as well. Here are just a few examples:

It would be a huge task to change all those basketball-related articles just to make them look "impartial".

P.S. Even though HandsomeFella is on the opposing side, I do agree with him that the wording for this article is terrible. 202.124.89.206 (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Those are all official titles; we are not responsible for their inherent sexism. We are responsible for descriptive titles such as the ones under discussion here. Powers ^T 15:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT Since more than 200 national basketball teams use the same format, I can't see the reason to make exceptions for 3 or 4 countries. Some of them just weren't word properly, with Canada national men's basketball team being the most amateur one. 101.112.81.64 (talk) 05:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm not supporting an exception for the articles mentioned; it's the other ones that should be moved, for the reasons I stated above. HandsomeFella (talk) 09:11, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, even if there's no women's team at present, you can't suppose there never will be one. Voice (SWE) (talk) 10:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, I support all of the above to be renamed according to the adapted format, but in the meantime, can someone with power at least move this article to Canada men's national basketball team please? The current name (Canada national men's basketball team) is just uniquely hilarious and simply a result of wrong wording. 2sc945 (talk) 10:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment - there's a stalemate going on here, with both sides citing conflicting WP:title and project guidance in their favor. Unless supporters and opposers can come to agreement on alternative title, this RM is likely to close with No moves being made. Additionally, arguments predicting or conjectureing how millions of readers will react to a title hold little weight in these policy/guideline based discussions.--Mike Cline (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm fine with such a close. =) It's simple; there are two United States national basketball teams, and it's inappropriate and borderline sexist to assume that the team a reader is looking for is the men's team. Powers ^T 14:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose - Sexist as can be. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Notable prospects" section

The "notable prospects" section of this article is out of date, inaccurate, and does not adhere to the list guidelines, per WP:Source list. Over the past several months, names have been randomly added or removed, without references. This section needs clear criteria for inclusion, and every name added needs a source. Or, the section needs to be removed. Thank you for your input. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this call for input from 3 months ago, today I hid the "notable prospects" section from view. There needs to be a discussion about the inclusion criteria for a notable prospect. The sources haven't been updated in 2 years, and the section is frequently vandalized by editors adding random names. If there is no criteria for inclusion on this list, then it needs to be removed. Thank you again. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Canada Mens national basketball team

1956 Canadian team at the Olympics has Al Brown as a player. It should say MEL BROWN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ripley500 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Depth chart

Does this section have any sources? If not it would not qualify and would be filed under original research and will have to be removed. I would love to see some sources and keep it though. Are there any? Krazytea(talk) 05:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure this is just some editor's opinion. I have looked for sources of this online and found none. In fact, as of Jan. 26, 2021 the top Canadian in the NBA according to https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/nba-player-ratings/ WAR are Luguentz Dort and Chris Boucher, but those guys are buried as third stringers on this depth chart, whereas the worst Canadian in the NBA in WAR is Tristan Thompson, who this depth chart has in the starting 5, so the chart would seem to bear little relationship with current roster members performance. JoeSchlabotnik (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]