Jump to content

Talk:Canciones de Amor (Ricardo Arjona album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCanciones de Amor (Ricardo Arjona album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 17, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 3, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ricardo Arjona released a compilation album under the same name as Alejandro Fernández, Rocío Dúrcal and Sin Bandera did?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Canciones de Amor (Ricardo Arjona album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 15:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've read through this a couple times, and found a couple minor issues, which are:

  • "Ricardo Arjona on trhough Sony Music" fix couple errors there
  • "The album charted at number 16 on the US Billboard Top Latin Albums " Billboard and latin Albums should be linked in lead rather than later on.

That being said, I have to fail this on broadness grounds. I get that not as much would be written on a compilation album than an original one, but there's still a lot that could be added to this article. Wasn't there still critical reception of the choices for the album? Which prior albums were primarily featured? The albums are noted but it doesn't do into any detail. On top of that, the only sources in the article are iTunes and Billboard. This actually is an issue for notability guidelines, since I have to wonder why there are no news sources or other music sources in the article. It would take little effort to double the size of this article and it should at least get to there before re-nomination. Wizardman 15:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]