Talk:Candida auris
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Candida auris article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Context
[edit]"Contexc[sic]" section, because alarmism and sensationalism belong in an encyclopedia. No wonder you are considered little above factoid pages, and more and more a propaganda machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.37.30.44 (talk) 20:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
- It would help for you to read the source. The New York Times belies your ill thought out and poorly formatted remark.
- When you sign on talk pages, please use four tildes ~~~~ . Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Adding microscopic image of Candida auris
[edit]The article currently doesn't contain an image of the yeast, so I propose adding the following to article:
My proposed ref is: "{{cite journal |vauthors=Kumar D, Banerjee T, Pratap CB, Tilak R |title=Itraconazole-resistant Candida auris with phospholipase, proteinase and hemolysin activity from a case of vulvovaginitis |journal=Journal of Infection in Developing Countries |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=435–7 |date=April 2015 |pmid=25881537 |doi=10.3855/jidc.4582}}"
Does anyone support or oppose the idea? I'm also open to suggestions on where to add it to the article. Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2023 (UTC)