Talk:Candy / Molly's Lips

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Alternative music: Nirvana Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Nirvana task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tempo#Beats per minute|beats per minute]] The anchor (#Beats per minute) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

Article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:56, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Great, great value! -JaneLame

Fair use rationale for Image:MollyLips.jpg[edit]

Image:MollyLips.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MollyBrazil.jpg[edit]

Image:MollyBrazil.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Bleach" remaster[edit]

On the Bleach remaster, there is a live show recorded February 9, 1990 at Pine Street Theatre, the exact same place and date that this version of "Molly's Lips" was recorded. Should it be noted, then, that this live version is no longer exclusive to this single? Tubularbells1993 (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or rare, for that matter? Tubularbells1993 (talk) 15:39, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 September 2018[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. Not particularly controversial. bd2412 T 01:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice, "[f]or split albums of which there is no single official title, use the two artist names separated with two spaces and a forward slash, such as Isis / Pig Destroyer. ... If the split has two titles, one per side, use the same forward-slash formatting, such as Jihad / Freezing Moon." Articles from "Candy/Molly's Lips" to "Touch Me I'm Sick/Halloween" are Category:Split singles. Articles from "Achilles/Engineer" to "Zu/Iceburn" are Category:Split albums. I would appreciate help from an editor, who can use tools to move multiple articles at once. — bieχχ (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:51, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice Category:Split EPs–it also contains articles which should be renamed in the same fashion. I didn't include Akron/Family & Angels of Light, because Akron/Family is the name of a band. — bieχχ (talk) 16:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I don't have a stake in this and an opinion yet, I'd like to point out that Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice is not a guideline which has gained community consensus. I'm not sure if this conflicts with any other guideline and would appreciate if someone would point out if it does. --Gonnym (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TITLESLASH only says "Some topics have a slash in the name, and should be named accordingly". MOS:SLASH seems to support almost all of this proposal as it reads "A spaced slash may be used ... to separate items that include at least one internal space (the NY 31 east / NY 370 exit), where for some reason use of a slash is unavoidable". — bieχχ (talk) 17:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TITLESLASH supports titles that use slash. However, out of the first 10 articles I've checked, most had no sources, a couple had sources to things which don't even mention the joint single - these articles don't even have sources that support that they are commonly known as such (or even notable for an article, but that is a different issue). Fast Girl/Beware Wolf and Fluorescent Grey/Oh, It's Such a Shame do have 1-2 sources that confirm that they are called as such. Will wait to see if anyone else contributes to this. --Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per MOS:SLASH. Not a big deal, and I agree that spaces around the slash improve readability. Notability issues mentioned by Gonnym should be addressed separately – go ahead and WP:PROD what needs to be prodded. No such user (talk) 08:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, per MOS:SLASH. See other examples in Category:Split EPs. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.