Talk:Canterbury Archaeological Trust
 | Daily page views
|
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Canterbury Archaeological Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090726003049/http://www.canterburytrust.co.uk:80/friends/friends.htm to http://www.canterburytrust.co.uk/friends/friends.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Burglary
[edit]Apparently, Canterbury Archaeological Trust has been burgled with many hundreds of items stolen. Yet, I can't find any images of the these items on Wikimedia Commons. So how do we know what to look out for when we get offered things, which we can then report to the police? Is this Trust expecting us to be psychic? If so, I'll get out my hazel twitching sticks. Aspro (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Just added 'Daily page views' graph to this talk page. The views (or lack of) are embarrassing. As a Trust it should not exclusively be a club for keen amateurs acting in an amateurish way. They need to promote themselves more professionally (and they can get that knowhow Pro bono buy asking around). All I can find about their work is something on Facebook ! Aspro (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
- Two articles in the Guardian and the Trust's Facebook page do have images of beads etc. which were immediately registered as missing directly after the burglary. But the Guardian articles said that because the Trust has a great many small items which all have to be checked against their lists, they will not know what pictures to publish until they have done a full inventory. They are having to bring in assistance for this. That is why a full set of images of missing items has not been immediately available. Storye book (talk) 10:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)