Talk:Capital Area Multimodal Gateway

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename[edit]

Can someone that knows how to rename article officially rename this one Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway? The Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway officially opens, today. The old station is scheduled for demolition to create the parking lot for the new Capital Area Multi Modal Gateway. Thanks. I'll working on updating the article changing tenses and such. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just got through figuring out how to do this by myself and changing (including the additiona of a new "description" section) the article accordingly to reflect both the previous station on site and the new one before someone edited in the middle of my edit. --Criticalthinker (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on my talk page, apologies for the edit conflict. It really sucks to lose a bunch of work. But as for the titles, "Multimodal" is much more common in the sources than "Multi Modal", with nearly 5,000 Google News hits compared to 3.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It just happened again, though I've copied and pasted my answer this time in case something like this happened. Someone else is currently editing the page. I want people to hold off and let me do this. My edits have more citations and is better arranged. If someone want to tweek them, that's fine, but please stop the editiing for the moment, folks. --Criticalthinker (talk) 16:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's the nature of a collaborative project, I'm afraid. Your move made the station pop up on watchlists. At any rate, Epicgenius seems to have stopped editing; I'm sure we're all happy to let you take a crack at it to avoid future edit conflicts. Let us know if you need anything else.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capital Area Multimodal Gateway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]