Talk:Caracal/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Immediate problems[edit]
Cleanup banners[edit]
This article does not need or have many cleanup banners, such as {{clarifyme}}, {{citation needed}} and {{POW}} tags.
Plagiarism[edit]
This article does not plagiarise. The images are also properly licensed.
References[edit]
The references are perfect. All paragraphs are properly sourced.
Images[edit]
The images are relevant to the topic and they have suitable captions.
Well-written?[edit]
This article is well-written. It contains perfect prose. It has a lead section and proper layout. The spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization.
Original research[edit]
This article contains no original research.
Coverage[edit]
This article is broad in coverage and goes into detail only where necessary.
POV[edit]
This article has a neutral point of view.
Stability[edit]
This article is relatively stable. There has been no edit wars, but there has been quite a few undos in the history of the article due to vandalisms. However, these are not large-scale, so I can summarize that the stability is good enough for this article to be a good article.
Overview[edit]
This article is ready to be a good article.