Talk:Cardiotocography

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cardiotocography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Additions/new article

I could not find any article regarding STAN on wikipedia. STAN is an acronym for ST-analysis and is the addition of ST-segment analysis to the standard CTG recording. This has shown to be a better and more precise method than CTG alone, and is now in widespread use. Could someone write an article on this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.165.75.134 (talk) 15:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

This article should be merged with Cardiotocograph and possibly also with Nonstress test. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has since been merged with nonstress test, but the merger between Cardiotocograph and Cardiotocography still needs to be done. Are there any preferences for the title of the merged article? Looking at analogous medical articles (mostly in Category:Medical imaging), articles seem to favor using -graphy over -graph or -gram (though an exception is electrocardiogram - which should probably be moved to electrocardiography). --Scott Alter 02:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonstress test is still posted as a separate article. Maybe a redirect is needed? Biolprof (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiotocograph is now redirected to this article. Nonstress test does not need to be merged or redirected as it is distinct diagnostic test. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 03:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

This article currently has no refs. One good ref is (Mires, G.; Williams, F.; Howie, P. (2001). "Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population". BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 322 (7300): 1457–1460, discussion 1460–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457. PMC 32308. PMID 11408301.) re cardiotocography vs Doppler auscultation. --Una Smith (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio

The tone is wrong and some seems to be from [1]. 87.83.31.234 (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reassuring and non-reassuring

You say: proposed terminology of a three-tiered system to replace the older undefined terms "reassuring" and "nonreassuring" Sure.. but you should mention what reassuring and nonreassuring is Remember this is just a PROPOSAL 182.255.99.214 (talk) 09:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cardiotocography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AI methods?

IntelligentAgent300 has added (and then re-added after reversion) a section about an innovative AI method for cardiotocography interpretation. I argue that this section, being based on a method proposed by a single author in a text book chapter, with no evidence that the method has been implemented and proven in practice, is speculative at best and does not yet merit inclusion in this article. See WP:MEDRS for a discussion of reliable sources on medical information. I invite IntelligentAgent300 to discuss this matter. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]