Talk:Carl-Zeiss-Gymnasium Jena
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Status notification
[edit]I am now at a certain point in the progress of writing where I can say that the article meets almost all information I can give personally from my own position. If there should be more or wrong information please change it or ask me to do so. Especially if you can contribute more information from your own knowledge (e.g. if you have personal relations with the school?) it would be very helpful. With further steps of attaining knowledge information will be added from my side. Addendum: I do not quite understand the evalutation reason of Victuallers when he says that a reason for a low grading is that the school is German but has an entry in an English encyclopedia. What is the point of this if this article does not get rated by its quality but its content background?
Wellus 19:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carl-Zeiss-Gymnasium Jena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060918230836/http://internat.vacom.de:80/ to http://internat.vacom.de/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)