Talk:Carmen Gloria Quintana

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Chile Mid‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article could be expanded with translated text from Spanish Wikipedia. Once translation has been completed, please remove the `trans-ES=yes` switch from the template.

Elimination of POV[edit]

For User:CieloEstrellado - Please stop trying to insert your POV on every single text about the Pinochet years. If, as you slyly imply, are just interested in a better use of the english language, then DO correct the language, not use the opportunity to insert extraneous adjectives that do not add an iota of information to the text. Also, I would reccomend that you DO NOT add elements of your own unsubstantiated ideas to the article. Facts are welcome, not gratuitous abuse. The facts are horrific enough on their own for them to need to be embellished by false details of what YOU think it may have transpired. The truth usually can defend itself. Thanks. Mel Romero 04:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes - Explanation[edit]

Fine. I see I will have to expound on the changes, so you won't keep on including misleading information: a) The official version refers to the version presented by the MILITARY PATROL, not by the "dictatorship" as you, in your biased editing, insist. That version is based on their official declarations during the investigation, and is reflected in the official documents of the trial. The government never presented any explanation at the time, simply refering the case as a "investigation in progress" (check the newspaper archives of the time for the official government declarations) b) the local people who found the bodies abandoned on the irrigation ditch DID NOT take them to the local hospital, as you insist on including. They simply notified the police (Carabineros), who in turn, took them to a local hospital (Posta Central), from where they were later derivated to a more specialized hospital. If you don't want to believe the official "dictatorship" documents about that, at least read the declarations of the mother and uncle of Rodrigo Rojas, both contained in their webpages, and readily accessible from the corresponding links. c) I see no purpose in deleting the information about what the injured were doing in the place or what implements were they carrying. Including that information doesn't make them deserving of what happened to them, or the military patrol less guilty. But it gives a sense of fairness in portraying the spirit of the times. I could continue, but I think those 3 examples are enough to prove my point. As for making the entry more readable, and to presume of being able to improve on my english, well, I see those charges as ad hominem, only designed to bolster your weak scholarship, and truly they don't bear any relevance to the matter at hand... Mel Romero 05:58, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by User:Emilquin[edit]

Moved here from the article text:

I just wanted to add that there were two groups that joined at one point. One was carrying all the above mentioned: tires, molotov cocktails, etc, Rodrigo Rojas was part of that group. The other group was carrying nothing, Carmen Gloria Quintana was part of the latter group. Once we joined, some of us (we were four)help to carry tires, and that was it. I know, because I was there. I am Carmen's sister and remember that morning vividly. As for the military version, the fact that they were dumped in a ditch in the outskirts of Santiago speak for itself. The fact that my sister and Rodrigo were severily beaten prior to being set on fire can be was attested by the doctor that examined them at the clinic. Finally, I wanted to point out That Fernandez Dittus only did house arrest. Justice was never served in this case, nor on many other human right abuses during the Chilean dictatorship of Pinochet.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Emilquin (talk • contribs) 20:29, 14 May 2010

Requested move 22 September 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Gloria Quintana → Carmen Quintana – There is no other person of same name. Also, the middle name may not be necessary, commonly used or not. I am sure that the proposed name is commonly referring to the subject. George Ho (talk) 04:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 15:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:COMMONAME. Vastly referred as Carmen Gloria Quintana (much much more than "Carmen Quintana"). It is not exactly a "middle name", by the way. Asqueladd (talk) 09:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carmen Gloria Quintana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]