Talk:Caroline Matilda of Great Britain

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

British Royalty Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark High‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Norway

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move[edit]

I've moved this page back to its original title because Caroline Matilda's highest rank was queen consort and therefore her article should follow the naming conventions for queen consorts, eg. "Alexandra of Denmark" not "Princess Alexandra of Denmark". Deb 16:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Throat Cancer[edit]

Are we quite sure that she died of throat cancer? I know her mother did, but I'm not sure Caroline Matilda did. Deb 16:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, the German Wikipedia says she died of epidemic typhus, the Swedish Wikipedia says she died of scarlet fever. I don't know which is right. esmi 08:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take that out then, and transfer it to her mother. Deb 11:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Layout[edit]

And can someone please change the layout again? It doesn't look so good when there's no text on the first half of the article next to the picture (I tried but couldn't find out how it works). Thanks! esmi 08:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the layout, took a little playing around with it. Also rearranged the layout of the Titles section. I think if we are showing what her titles were, the dates should come after. But only an opinion. Prsgodd e ss187 11:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, looks much better now!! esmi 15:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup and Expert Tags[edit]

Interesting article! Has all the makings of a great PBS drama.

I have tagged this article because there are few things I found that seemed to conflict, a little repetition, and some references that were not clear to me.

Under Affair:

Caroline Matilda was unhappy in her marriage, neglected and spurned by the king, and affected by his illness. This is an almost identical sentence to one in prior paragraph.

The Queen was well aware that Struensee was behind these improvements, No improvements previously mentioned-assume king's improvements?

Through the Queen, Struensee gained control over the King and took over absolute power in Denmark. This seems to contradict prior statements that k ing came to trust Streunsee without mention of the queen, and the point that the king didn't pay much attention to the queen in general. So, how did this come about?

The court moved to Frederiksborg Palace on 19 November and then back to Christiansborg Castle on 8 January 1772. Is this an important point? Why?

their marriage ended up in divorce.. I assume that means the king and queen, but previously discussing Streunsee and accomplice, so a little confusing.

Also the article needs copyediting for standard English after expert corrections made.

Peacedance (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This Danish reference, digitalized from a reference-book, has a great deal of information [[1]]. I'll try to answer some of your concerns.

No need for repetition.

Struensee, who had the king's full confidence, managed to convince the king to show the queen a little bit more consideration and to be more civil to her, rather than rude, in every day life, and to avoid making the situation worse.

In 1770, the king was no longer sane and the court started to pay more attention to the queen and regard her as the "first person" at court. As her lover, Struensee came to rule. He already had control of the king, whos signature he required, but informally, the court regarded the queen to be the kings legal guardian, as she was offcicially the person colsest to him. This was, however, only a case about attitudes.

I am not sure. But this was the year of the revolution, so best let it stay until we now.

The king and queen was divorced, yes, Struensee was executed.

The article can be expanded through this reference - sadly, it is in Danish. It is a good article, but its problem is that the text should be a little rearranged to avoid confusion, as the chronology of events is a little unclear. --85.226.43.158 (talk) 15:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The part about the move from Frederiksborg to Christiansborg is probably to stress that it was crucial for the plotters that Struensee and the king and queen was in Copenhagen, as the regiments of the supporting officers of the coup was placed in Copenhagen. Had they stayed on in Frederiksborg the coup would have had to have been postponed. --Saddhiyama (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now expanded and clearified the article. I hope this was a little clearer. --85.226.43.158 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of the new information, 85.226.43.158. and also Saddhiyama. It is really interesting. I did look at the reference, but Google can't translate it very well. May look some more later. I did get a laugh when it said the something about the queen's behavior and the label embossed(sic) court. I imagine it was supposed to have something to do with the court's impression, but where they got the "label" I have no idea!

I did a little more work tonight on clarity/continuity. There were some instances of, "She did A, instead of B, which was considered scandalous." - was A or B scandalous? And, the typical label "Later Life" didn't quite fit, because she died at 24, etc. I did make a fair number of changes, but I don't think any big deal, just for ease of reading and continuity, about which I am a bit compulsive (I am a research writer).

Please revert anything that is incorrect or meaning changed - I don't want to rain on anyone's parade! Someone had a hold of a part, so some is lost, but that's the way it goes. Maybe another night. Thanks for answering all my questions. Lara Peacedance (talk) 04:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates[edit]

She wasn't queen until her death in 1775. She stopped being Queen of Denmark when she was divorced three years earlier. Shouldn't her tenure be fixed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.114.80 (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caroline Matilda of Great Britain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060830234237/http://ftp.cac.psu.edu/~saw/royal/r10.html to http://ftp.cac.psu.edu/~saw/royal/r10.html#I340

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]