Talk:Casa Pia
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I think ist's better to merge the two articles. Anmasagosi 10:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
The entry is very poor in bibliography and information about the scandal. Several books have been published on the topic and the trial is still going on. Someone with knowledge of the present situation should update this entry and fill it out so it actually is useful.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Casa Pia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506091708/http://www.casapia.pt:80/ to http://www.casapia.pt/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)