Talk:Casino Nova Scotia

Canada: Nova Scotia / Music Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Opening comment

Don't mean to be rude, but is it just me or does this article read more like a travel brochure or tv ad? The POV makes it sound like the hotel manager is trying to save his/her job. And don't get me started on the typos...

Virtually all of the info was added by one editor, user:RGraves/user:24.222.31.210. The version be fore he started working is here: [1]. Much of this info is excessively detailed and unencyclopedic. It does need a major overhaul. -Will Beback · † · 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've cut back a lot of he material, include one whole copyvio section. Future additions should be sourced. -Will Beback · † · 22:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RGraves is an employee, who out of boredom did up the page. It was not ment to be an advertisement and was done up to provide info on the place, hence the lack of sources becuase it is just knowledge for someone who is working.

Marked this as Spam in the hope that it will kick someone into making it more useful. It would be nice to have some real content on here and not a constantly edited advert. Come on Casino Nova Scotia, set your marketing people onto it or something, there are enough adverts for the place elsewhere, let's have some facts and some history please? Foxywizard (talk) 19:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You really shouldn't mark things for deletion when you really just think they need editing. Nevertheless, I have toned down the language in some sections of the article, declined the speedy deletion and removed the advert tag. Note that these are all things any editor can do. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Casino Nova Scotia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060829040039/http://www.bmreng.com:80/project3.html to http://www.bmreng.com/project3.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Renovated in April 24, 2000, June 1, 2006"

{Help} This is confusing. I really do not know what to suggest except that it is odd not knowing about just what does "renovation" mean in this statement. Was it renovated just on the one day for each date which because it is a month/day/year marker it would seem to rate an "on" instead of an "in" unless the renovation"s" took place between the two dates and would rate a "from" with the application of a conjunction joining the two dates. What can you suggest?Srednaus Lenoroc (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]