This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. NW(Talk) 21:20, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
– First off the recent moves were undiscussed. "of Guimarães" is not necessary because she is most known for being Duchess of Braganza (even if by marriage) since she was the one who brought the royal claim to the illegitimate Braganza line. Her notability derived from her marriage into the Braganza family and the subsequent use of the title by her like say Diana, Princess of Wales for example. It is not necessary to indicate she is a second degree infanta like her sister because her sister is only under Infanta Maria of Guimarães because she is unnotable thus follows the arbitrary rules Wikipedia sets for the titles of royal women who married into other families that they are listed under their maiden name. This rule is ignored when the royal woman's married title or other title held during their lifetime is more significant than the one they derived from birth like Empress Elisabeth of Austria and Marie of Romania. Either we can move her back to Infanta Catherine, Duchess of Braganza or even just drop the Infanta all together and call her Catherine, Duchess of Braganza since it seems from what I read, she wore the pants in the house. --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 17:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC) --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 06:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems to need discussion/comparison.....e.g. Alexandra of Denmark is better known as Queen Alexandra, no? Or are royal/noble titles customarily omitted entirely?Skookum1 (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Catherine, Duchess of Braganza is the most common the other two are nearly unheard of.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 22:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
