Talk:Cats 101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expand/Merge[edit]

This article should cover the importance of the show. Otherwise, a redirect may be appropriate. --Stormbay (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I agree that the "Cats 101" article should deffinatly remain seperate from the "Dogs 101" entry. Just as with dogs, there are dozens of different breeds of cats. Far too many to merge the two articles (besides, they're two completely different species). As for having difficulty finding sources to cite for this article, I easily found dozens of clips of the show on YouTube. Which was how I was able to find the citation for an earlier editor's entry for the Cornish Rex article, quoting the breed as being discribed as "the Greyhound of the cats".User:IdontdrinktheKoolAid --IdontdrinktheKoolAid (talk) 03:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was no consensus. MartinZ02 (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should merge this with Dogs 101, since I am unlikely to find enough sources for Cats 101 to have its own article. Cutecutecuteface2000 ([[User Cats 101 amazing brilliancy talk:Cutecutecuteface2000|Cutecuteface needs attention]]) 17:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. What? No no no no no no no no no no no, those two are different shows! Strong oppose. 68.43.192.71 (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, plus more There's also Pets 101. Like the other two, it has no references and very little content. The question is what to call the merged article. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.