Talk:Cdist - Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Orphan page[edit]

This page is orhpan, because it has been removed from

Comparison of open source configuration management software, where it would make most sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicoSchottelius (talk • contribs) 19:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... cdist is another open source configuration management software like bcfg2 or puppet or chef, which all have similar pages on wikipedia. Although the usage may not yet have been widespread like the older tools, the featureset is comparable.

Furthermore the Comparison of open source configuration management software page requires a page for each tool.

I am the author of cdist, but I have had no intention to "promote" or "advertise" on wikipedia. My motivation is to provide a fair amount of overview with objective description.

If the proposed article does not meet wikipedias standards, I'm more than willing to improve it.

If this article is really considered to be spam, I'm wondering what the difference between this article and the articles CFEngine, Puppet (software), Chef (software) or Bcfg2 is. --NicoSchottelius (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it is describing cdist in a neutral way. Most of the article has been rephrased to match wikipedias guidelines. I've compared it again to the other articles referenced in the other talk entry to ensure it's quality is on the same standard. (your reason here) --NicoSchottelius (talk) 20:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very poorly written article[edit]

I think I lost 10 IQ points while reading this article. It's very monotonous and poorly written and it makes frequent reference to very trivial, pseudo-promotional points ("it's being talked about on Twitter"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.176.129 (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are issues are still here?[edit]

Last edit on talk page is 2013, but page is edited in 2015, in particular I rewrote introduction in spirit of Ansible. I propose to reevaluate issues. Arch wiki have page on it, so I belive notability is not issue. It is not too technical to me, but I am bit of power-user, so I may be biased. Opinions, or I can remove issues template by myself? 212.16.8.3 (talk) 11:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cdist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cdist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233448/http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/man/latest/man7/cdist-type.html to http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/man/latest/man7/cdist-type.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]