This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
I feel like the section about her time at Kotaku needs fleshing out. I’m referring specifically to issues with her reporting on accusations against Jeremy Soule and issues raised with that reporting by Nathalie Lawhead, one of the accusers cited in the article.Aresef (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aresef, thanks for bringing this up. By chance, were you able to find any reliable sources describing the issues? I haven't been able to find any publications reporting the issues, both while writing the article and in a few cursory searches afterwards, which is the reason for the absence. Aranya(talk)21:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lawhead themself has written about it. The article at issue had an editor’s note appended to it. In tweets, former writer Heather Alexandra has cited the incident as a factor in her departure. I understand the issues in terms of quality sourcing but I think we need to do something in this article or we’re whitewashing her time at Kotaku.Aresef (talk) 00:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delayed reply Aresef. I understand the concern with not including the information, but all additions must adhere to core policies including WP:V and WP:BLP. The BLP policy is really stringent about how we talk about living people, so we take care to only include reliably-sourced info, even if that means we are missing some pretty important context and even whitewashing.
Specifically, Wikipedia can't really make the judgements on whether we should mention this situation, and then how we describe it and what viewpoints we include from who. Once reliable publications report on the issues, then we can focus on how to represent and give appropriate weight to the sources' viewpoints and how they talk about it. Sorry if I'm sounding repetitive. Aranya(talk)03:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. At this point, I doubt that those articles will be written. I guess it's a symptom of broader issues in video game journalism and the lack of non-enthusiast press coverage of the industry. But I digress. Thanks for having this talk.--Aresef (talk) 03:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree, which is unfortunate, but I'll still try to keep an eye out in case any new coverage comes up. Thanks and happy editing. Best, Aranya(talk)03:07, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
