Talk:Center for Class Action Fairness/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk • contribs • count) 02:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- For the most part, the prose is grand. However, when using quotes, you have a tendency to place a comma before opening the quoted text, which is often disruptive to the flow of the sentence. I'd also advise against retaining a capital letter if the quoted text is part of a sentence, as it's visually jarring. You've got a mixture of "dumb" and "smart" quotation marks there (probably an artefact of working in a word processor prior to adding it to the article), they should probably be standardised - it doesn't matter which you go for, but one or the other uniformly is ideal.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations are good. Fixed a lot of unspaced ref tags though - just remember to ensure that any closing ref tags are followed by a space before text resumes.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is good.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article is neutral and unbiased.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Article seems stable. I see there's a pending case being discussed but I would hardly think its outcome would be controversial enough that the article's stability would be threatened.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Sole image is commons and is appropriately used. No problems there.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Ah well spotted. I'll try to sort that out shortly.
Howz that, I think I've got em all. If not can you address those outstanding which are problematic? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)