This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
@WeyerStudentOfAgrippa: I'd recommend doing a db-author deletion, I can't find sufficient sources to merit inclusion as its own separate article.
@Rolf h nelson: The article from The Guardian is a reliable source because it is significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. The article was published in the main technology section of the news service, and per here, the author is "a senior technology reporter for Guardian US in San Francisco."
The Norris article is also clearly significant and secondary. I argue that it is reliable because it is the published news of a prestigious university. Though it is associated with UC Berkeley, it is independent of CHAI.
I think it is wholly within the spirit and intention of Wikipedia's notability guidelines to consider these two sources taken together as establishing notability. Consider that Dewritech, a user with over 110k contributions, marked the article as reviewed and only added a third-party maintenance template, implicitly affirming the basic notability of the article. And this was before I added the article from The Guardian and two other sources.
In light of the above, I propose the notability maintenance template be removed.WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 18:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
