Talk:Cervix

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cervix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Cervix has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 28, 2014	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 9, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
March 3, 2023	Peer review	Reviewed
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 23, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the cervix, which in adult women is much smaller than the rest of the uterus, is twice as large during childhood as the body of the uterus?
Current status: Good article

Anatomy: Organs High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to organs.

Women's History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

New Merger proposal

I propose that Cockscomb cervix be merged into Cervix#Anatomical abnormalities. CV9933 (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think I'd support that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No objections after two weeks - Merge completed. CV9933 (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Fertility Section

hi, i am reading the fertility section and i am having trouble with its tone. In particular, its use of the term "quality". And the judgement of this said quality seems to derive from sites external to the woman. Moreover, most of the section is not cited. The citation that is given, i.e., 12 the question is directed to the person whose fertility is the topic, that is, the woman, which i discerned only from its title which uses 'your'. But in Wikipedia, this article, the judge is not the woman, but instead an other. As Wikipedia is supposed to be written from a neutral perspective (an impossibility!) this section is obviously not congruent to that Wikipedia policy. Instead, this article places the assessment of the "quality" of that which pertains to woman, to elsewhere, that is, an other than herself. *a cis woman growing a philosopher's beard MichelleGDyason 06:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]