Talk:Chagi

India: History Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Kick practice

Doesn't 'chagi' also refer to a form of kicking practice in martial arts? You can tell by seeing what comes up in google image search. I think it's based on becoming very accurate with kicks and attaining a lot of flexibility to perform them. It might be a useful disambiguation for this article. Tyciol (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Tyciol your point is interesting. Would like to know more about it, is wiki page for that martial art present? If the martial art is known by name CHAGI itself, then it would be better to hav disambigous WP on Chagi article.

If CHAGI is used as suffix (like YI-DAN CHAGI) then it is better to include this martial art WP as disambgious in this Chagi dynasty article. (I mean mentioning at top of WP to redirect to martial art).

Thnx Indianprithvi (talk) 17:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See these 2 inscriptions of chagi kings in south indian inscriptions and decide they are andhra kshariya or durjaya kammas

619. 2530/1897.�(Sanskrit and Telugu.) On a pillar in the Amareswara temple, guntur. Records in S. 1079, I&vara, gift of sheep for a lamp by Kavaliya-Singana-Peggada, the minister of the Mahamandale&vara Potaraja, the son of Chagi-Dora of the Durjaya family.

637. 271 of 1897.�{Sanskrit and Telugu.) On a pillar lying in the prakara of the same temple. Records in S. 1082 gift of two lamps by Kallaya-Nayaka, the younger brother of Pota, the son of Chagi-Dora of the Durjaya family, and by his wife, who was the daughter of Muchchay.a-Nayaka of Rachchuru, of the same family.

Sagi kings are not related to Chagi rulers. they are other kings of andhra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.132.183 (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chagi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313210732/http://igmlnet.uohyd.ernet.in:8000/gw_44_5/hi-res/hcu_images/G2.pdf to http://igmlnet.uohyd.ernet.in:8000/gw_44_5/hi-res/hcu_images/G2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]