Jump to content

Talk:Champagne Problems (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleChampagne Problems (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2022Good article nomineeListed
August 4, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
January 22, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Champagne Problems (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Here comes a review for you in the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 10:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Under the released and length parameters, shouldn't Champagne Problems not be before each part since we already know what these are?
  •  Done
  • Why is dance-pop not listed as the genre in the infobox?
  •  Done
  • The creation sentence should be the third of the first para instead, as this info should be before the final product's music
  • I wasn't sure what you were asking here so I did some c/e hoping that helps resolve this issue.
  • "Champagne Problems was created over" → "The album was created over" and shouldn't you mention this was during late 2021?
  •  Done
  • Remove the part about Heartbreaker having used the same format previously because this is the lead, not background
  •  Done
  • "from Champagne Problems #DQH1 and Champagne Problems #DQH2" → "from both #DQH1 and #DQH2" since you already wrote Champagne Problems #DQH1 earlier in this para
  •  Done
  • Remove wikilink on YouTube
  •  Done

Background and creation

[edit]
  • Remove the comma before Heartbreaker
  •  Done
  • "on which it was issued for" → "which was released as planned for"
  • I did some c/e.

Composition and reception

[edit]
  • "of 24UR, and is entirely performed in English unlike her" → "of 24UR and is entirely performed in English, unlike Inna's"
  •  Done
  •  Done
  • "Musially, "Champagne Problems" is" → "Musically, "Champagne Problems" is"
  •  Done
  • Specify which series of Dance Queen's House the challenge was presented during
  •  Done
  • Are you sure the second OCC source can be used to verify it as her first entry since Hot because the history does not include download charts?
  • I am not sure, but according to Inna discography, it looks like Hot was the first and last entry in a UK album music chart before this recording. This fact would be something Billboard would indicate, but I know that overseas music charts do not go in-depth or provide analysis for feats such as this one. Let me know what you would like me to do about this.
  •  Done
  • The source does not call the album the singer's first charting record in Germany
  •  Done

Track listing

[edit]
  • You should add the respective sources to these parts to verify the track listings
  •  Done

Charts

[edit]
  •  Done

Release history

[edit]
  • Format → Format(s)
  •  Done

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks incredible at 1.0%!!!!
  • Why does ref 2 cite Apple Music while refs 12, 13 and 14 cite iTunes Store?
  •  Done
  • YouTube should be cited in the via parameter and cite the uploader as publisher instead on refs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11
  •  Done
  •  Done

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
  • AJona1992 Thanks a lot for jumping in, but I would say the genres sentence about the first release should be the last of the first para instead and just remove the first release to chart part altogether, really. --K. Peake 11:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]